Biggest digital wallet apps on mobile in the United States 2025, based on MAU

Published by

Jul 14, 2025

The most used digital wallets in the United States typically originate from within the country, with only one app reaching a MAU of more than

***

*******

. This is according to a ranking of the biggest apps that can function as a digital wallet for payments, based on a minimum of

******

monthly active users (MAU). Almost all popular wallets in the U.S. come from the country itself, with the likes of Venmo and Zelle being only available to this particular country. Nevertheless, digital wallets are typically not a popular payment method at POS in the United States.

Biggest digital wallet apps on mobile in the United States as of April 2025, by number of monthly active users (MAU)

App on Apple App Store or Google Play Store offering digital wallet services	App country of origin	First app release date	Monthly active users (MAU)	Share of app MAU worldwide	Month-on-month percentage change in MAU	Year-on-year percentage change in MAU
-	-	-	-	-	-	-
-	-	-	-	-	-	-
-	-	-	-	-	-	-
-	-	-	-	-	-	-
-	-	-	-	-	-	-
-	-	-	-	-	-	-
-	-	-	-	-	-	-
-	-	-	-	-	-	-
-	-	-	-	-	-	-
-	-	-	-	-	-	-

Download

Source

Show detailed source information?

Already a member?

Sources

Use Ask Statista Research Service

In cooperation with

AppMagic

Release date

June 2025

More information

Region

United States

Survey time period

April 2025

Special properties

This statistic is the result of research into roughly 250 different apps that allow for digital B2C or P2P payment transactions, either directly or via the linking of (virtual) cards. For more information, see the “Details” tab; * Exact user figures are unavailable, as payments is but one of several other services available in this app.

Supplementary notes

Digital wallets is a broad term and, sometimes, has different definitions across sources. For this statistic, digital wallets refer to apps that securely store payment credentials and allow these to be used either in e-commerce shopping or in a brick-and-mortar store. Numbers can include stored value wallets (e.g., PaysafeCard) or mobile money apps from Africa (e.g., M-Pesa), if they fall in this definition. The figures shown, however, exclude the following categories:

Buy now, pay later (BNPL), such as Klarna or Affirm, which allow for temporary loans;
Apps from money transfer organizations (MTOs), such as Western Union or Wise, which are used for remittances.

All figures concern apps that can be downloaded on either the Apple App Store or Google's Play Store. This leads to several data limitations:

Figures do not include apps that are downloaded on other storefronts;
Embedded payment services within larger (super) apps are not tracked separately. For example, the source does not provide figures on Amazon Pay, as this is embedded in the Amazon app. This also applies to the likes of LINE, Grab, or even neobanks like Revolut;
Google Pay and Samsung Pay have no separate figures, as these services are integrated in wallets that offer multiple services;
The source cannot track Apple Pay, as this app cannot be downloaded from the Apple App Store;
The source does not clarify cross-border figures (e.g., users of China's WeChat in European countries). One could assume international travel or tourism plays a role, but this is not confirmed.

The names provided are based off multiple publications covering digital wallets and focus on providers with an app. If an app does not feature in the statistic, it is because MAU figures were too small.

Citation formats