Analysists have often pointed to drug laws in the United States as a reason for the high discrepancy between the criminal justice situation of the United States and their international peers. Since the inception of “the war on drugs” by President Nixon, the United States has housed many criminals who were imprisoned for so-called low level drug offenses. Unfortunately, the war on drugs has combined with socio-economic disparities, such as poverty rates, to produce incarceration rates that are extraordinarily higher for the black men in America. Several documentaries and social-scientists have cited the effect the war on drugs has had on racial inequality in the United States, with incarceration rates being a concrete yet saddening example.
Depending on the nature of one’s crime, it may be better to be a prisoner in some states than others. This is due to the existence of the death penalty in all but 18 states and the District of Columbia. Although California had the highest number of people on death row in 2013, Texas is the undisputed capital of capital punishment. Between 1930 and 2013, 805 people were executed for their crimes in Texas.
There are of course those who benefit from the large prison population of the United States, namely those that provide services in the highly profitable prison industry. In 2009, more than 50 billion U.S. dollars was spent on state correctional facilities in the United States. Unsurprisingly, such astronomical expenditure levels have prompted critics of voice their concern over the extent of privatization present in the American prison system. After all, it appears unlikely those running the prisoners or co-ordinating prisoner related services will seek lower incarceration rates in future so long as their bottom line is dependent on the number of those unwillingly donning an orange jumpsuit.